China - Intellectual Property

General Administration of Customs Promulgates New Implementing Rules for Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

Updated Rules for Recognizing Famous Trademarks

New Administrative Measures for Software Products

China - Foreign Investment

Update to Rules on Approval of Foreign Invested Enterprises

Taiwan - IP

Internet Service Provider Liability Limitation Bill to Amend the Copyright Law

Taiwan Intellectual Property Office Announces Directory of Well-Known Trademarks

and Case Studies

CHINA

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

State Administration of Industry and Commerce Promulgates Rules for Recognizing Famous Trademarks

On April 21, 2009, the State Administration of Industry and Commerce ("SAIC") promulgated the Rules for Recognizing Famous Trademarks ("Rules"), which came into force that same day.

The Rules require that the Trademark Office ("TMO") and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board ("TRAB") consider the following factors in order to determine if a mark is famous: 1) reputation of a mark among the relevant public; 2) use of the trademark over a continuous period of time; 3) advertisement of the trademark over a continuous period of time, 4) the degree and geographical area of the advertising; 5) any record of protection of the mark as a famous mark in China or other countries; and 6) any other factors that relate to the reputation of the mark worldwide.

The Rules also require that the Central Disciplinary Committee and the Ministry of Supervision supervise the recognition work of the TMO and TRAB, by attending the meetings at which the recognition of a famous mark is discussed and examined. The supervision is intended to prevent or reduce opportunities for corruption to affect the recognition process.

New Administrative Measures for Software Products

On March 5, 2009, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology ("MIIT") promulgated the Administrative Measures for Software Products ("Administrative Measures"), which came into force on April 10, 2009. The New Administrative Measures replace the old Administrative Measures promulgated in 2000.

The new Administrative Measures differ from the old Administrative Measures in the following ways:

  1. Upon receipt of an application to register a software product on any designated media, the MIIT is required to publish a public notification to announce the software application. If the an opposition is not filed within 7 working days from the issuance of the public notification, the local software industry authority will approve the software registration application and issue the software product registration number and registration certificate.
  2. Local software industry authorities are no longer allowed to cancel software product registrations suspected of violations of law, bad faith registration, or which fail to satisfy national technical requirements. Local software industries must now report these suspected improper software registrations to the MIIT, and the MIIT should provide any necessary warnings, publish public notifications, or impose penalties against improper registrations.
  3. Various clauses restricting the production and distribution of unregistered software products have been deleted in the new Administrative Measures. This may imply that the MIIT is loosening the supervision of unregistered software products.

CHINA

FOREIGN INVESTMENT

Update to Approval of Foreign-Invested Enterprises

In March 2009, the Ministry of Commerce ("MOC") announced a Notice on Further Improving the Examination and Approval of Foreign-Investment Enterprises ("Notice"). Taking effect immediately, the Notice simplifies the MOC's examination and approval procedures for foreign-invested enterprise operations. The Notice will make it easier for foreign investors starting new entities in China, and implements many changes, including the following:

  1. Establishment of a branch of a foreign-invested enterprise now only requires recording the establishment of their branch with local commercial authorities before beginning operations. Previously, a branch had to undergo examination and approval by the local commercial authority before they could be set up.
  2. The MOC now delegates examination and approval power for large projects to the provincial commercial authorities and economic and technological development zones, unless the foreign invested enterprises operates projects that require substantial state resources or involve substantial state and economic interests. Previously, foreign-invested enterprises with a total investment amount of over US$100 million were subject to the examination and approval by the MOC for their establishment or modification of their capital, drafting of company charter and rules.

TAIWAN

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Internet Service Provider Liability Limitation Bill to Amend the Copyright Law

China's safe harbor law for Internet service providers ("ISP"s) has been in draft form for some time. On April 21, 2009, the Legislative Yuan completed the third reading of the draft Internet Service Provider Liability Limitation Bill ("ISP Bill"). The ISP Bill is now awaiting review by the Presidential Office. If promulgated by the President, the ISP Bill will implement the following changes to the existing Copyright Law:

  1. Upon discovery of online copyright infringement, copyright owners may either file legal proceedings directly, or notify the ISP operating the website with infringing content to remove the infringing content or information.
  2. ISPs must clearly inform users of the ISP's copyright protection regulations prior to providing service. In addition, ISPs must inform users that partial or complete termination of services will be carried out if the user is accused 3 in separate instances of infringement. ISPs that act according to the ISP bill will be exempt from civil liability for alleged infringement, or contractual liability to the alleged infringer. Internet users found to be infringing on copyrights should find the infringing content removed by the ISP. If the users do not submit a rebuttal to a copyright owner's take down notice, with a request to restore the removed content, the content should remain off the site.

Directory of Well-Known Trademarks

On March 17, 2009, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office ("TIPO") announced that it had compiled a list of all administrative decisions, and legal judgments rendered by the civil and criminal courts where trademarks had been deemed to be well-known within the last five years. The directory will be available to enforcement agencies, industries, scholastic institutions, and should help improve the protection of well-known marks.

Some examples of well-known trademarks listed in this directory are AEROSMITH & Design, COORS, MIT, QUARK, and QUARKXPRESS.

China

China Increases the Number of Industries Open to Foreign Investment from 267 to 400+

Four New IP Courts to be Established in Shanghai

Third Amendment to China's Patent Law Approved

Trademark Applications Skyrocket in China

Chinese Luxury Hotel Held Liable for Infringement by Tenant

Energizer Loses in U.S. Court against Chinese Manufacturers

China Food Safely Law in Drafting Stages

China Website Sues the MPAA for Defamation after Settling a Piracy Case

Revisions to Lawyer's Law

Revisions to Civil Procedure Law Announced

New Law on Mediation and Arbitration of Labor Disputes Adopted

State Establishes Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees

Business Income Tax Revisions

Major Revisions to the Catalogue for Foreign Investment

Supreme Court Rules on Foreign-Related Contract Disputes

Law on the Advancement of Science and Technology

Automatic Monitoring of Internet Pirated Content - Until May

New Regulations for Online Content Providers

New Labor Contract Law

Wipo Treaties

New Version Of Anti-Trust Law

Administrative measures to Protect Trademarks

China Adopts 9th Edition of International Goods Classifications

Royalties on Internet Content

New Guidelines on Music Websites

Elimination of De Facto Compulsory License System

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Limited Discovery in Property Cases

China to Impose Stricter Penalties for IPR Violations

More Courts Allowed to Handle Patent Cases

Third Revision Drafted for Patent Law

IPR Development in National Plan

Easier Market Entry for Chain Stores

New IPR Courts

Changes to Patent and Trademark Appeals

Courts' Subordinate Role Confirmed in new People's Congress Supervision Law

Partnership Enterprise Law Revised

New M&A Regulations

Corporate Bankruptcy Law Adopted

First Criminal Copyright Violations of Online Games

LV wins Unfair Competition Claim over Billboard Showing Handbag

Chinese Cybersquatters and Trademark Squatters Continue to Reap Profits on World Famous Trademarks

Regulation of Email and Spam

Constitutional Law Review

Open Court for Death Penalty Appeals

New Rules on Public Security Violations

Domain Name Disputes

Patent Law Reform

Foreign Trade Law Amended to Comply with China's WTO Commitments

New Regulations on Drug Import Took Effect on January 1, 2004

China Further Opens Up to Foreign Investment in Distribution Services

MOFCOM Amended the Regulations on Establishment of Investing Companies by Foreign Investors

Rules Promulgated to Govern Establishment of Foreign Invested Conference Exhibition Companies in China

Foreign Investment in China's Domestic Financial Institutions

Changes Made to Regulate Representative Offices of Foreign Insurance Institutions in China

China's Customs Service Strengthens Intellectual Property Protection

The Supreme Court Revises Its Interpretations on Trial of Internet Copyright Disputes in China

New Implementation Rules for Copyright Administrative Punishment

Certification and Accreditation Act

Administrative Permit Law

China Further Lifted Restrictions on Foreign Trade Authorities

New Financing Channel Available for Securities Companies

More Detailed Rules on Administration of QFII Foreign Exchange Issued

Shanghai Government Issued Detailed Rules for Foreign Investment in State-Owned Enterprises in Shanghai

Multinational Corporations' Regional Headquarters in Shanghai Encouraged

Foreign Invested R&D Centers in Shanghai

Cybersquatting Cases Hinge on Infringed Marks’ Chinese Fame

New Regulations on Famous Mark Verification and Protection

Rules on Registration and Administration of Certification Marks and Collective Marks

Implementation Rules for Madrid International Trademark Registrations

Foreign Investors Can Establish Venture Capital Companies In China To Engage In Venture Investment

MOFCOM Issued Specific Rules Regarding Foreign Invested Enterprises With Less Than 25% Foreign Ownership Interests

China Loosened Strict Restraints On Chinese-Foreign Trading Joint Ventures

Regulation of Foreign Purchases of Chinese Enterprises

Ministry of Culture Issues “Provisional Regulations on Internet Culture”

Restrictions Lifted on foreign ownership of Many Businesses

China Enters the WTO

PRC Trademark Law Amended

China Amended Copyright Law

China Amended Patent Law

Regulations on Protection of Integrated Circuit Layout Design

Explanations of the Supreme Court on Preliminary Injunction and Evidence Preservation for Trademark Infringement

New Computer Software Protection Act

Regulations on Administration of Technology Import and Export

China Gradually Opening its Banking Market

color="#000000">Foreign Ownership of Telecom Enterprises Loosened

Insurance Market Opening to Foreign Competition

Medicine Law (Law on Pharmaceutical Administration)

Internet Pharmaceutical Information Services

Foreign Investor's Reinvestment Tax Preference Restricted to Retained Earnings

China to Annul Tax Preference For Foreign Invested Enterprises

Official Internet Survey

New Implementation Rules of the Copyright Law

New Implementation Rules of the Trademark Law

Interpretations of the Supreme Court on Trial of Copyright Disputes

Amendment to the Implementation Rules of the Patent Law

Investment in Domestic Securities by Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors

Provisional Regulations on Restructuring State-Owned Enterprises by Infusion of Foreign Capital

MOFTEC Promulgated Rules for Administration of Foreign Invested Freight Carriers

Opinions on Patent Administration in Foreign Trade

Patent Law

Medicine Law (Law on Pharmaceutical Administration)

Internet Pharmaceutical Information Services

Restrictions on Foreign Investment into Internet and Telecommunications Activities

Interpretation of Digital Copyright Cases

Incentives for Software Export

US Firms Support Beijing Intermediate Court's Decision against Cybersquatting

New Rules Prepared to Regulate Foreign Direct Investment

Foreign Insurance Companies Shut Down

New Internet Information Service Regulation

color="#000000">Ordinance on Telecommunications

New Customs Law

Computer Software Copyright Registration Accelerated

New Internet and E-Commerce Regulations in China

According to the statistics from the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation (MOFTEC), China had 324,712 companies with foreign investment by the end of last year. Different levels of foreign trade and economic cooperation development zones attract a majority of foreign investment in China. In 1998, thirty-two state-level development zones attracted over US$10 billion of foreign direct investment in China, which is nearly 60% of the total foreign direct investment in 1998. This year, various special zones are being formed. For instance, in Beijing, a special valley for trade and investment in medical and biological areas is being constructed in the Beijing Economic and Technological Development Zone. In Shenzhen, a special software industrial park is under construction. In Guangzhou, the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone and Guangzhou High-Tech Industry Development Zone merged with each other late last year. The merged zone aims to lure more foreign investment in high- and new-technology industry, especially electronics, information technology, bio-engineering technology, medical science, optical, electrical and mechanical integration technology, and environmental protection technologies and equipment.

Taiwan

Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Approves Amendment to

Standard for Examination of Distinctiveness of Trademarks

Taiwan Removed from US's 301 Watch List

Taiwan and China on USTR’S Watch List

Taiwan Applications Steady

TIPO’s Compulsory License of Patent Technology Rejected by High Court

Internet Service Provider (ISP) Liabilities Bill Under Review by the Taiwan Legislative Yuan

Amendment to Taiwan Customs Procedures Effect on September 1, 2008

Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act and the Development of Intellectual Property Courts

Copyright Law Amendment

Status of Non-traditional Trademarks

Dissolution of Task Force for Raiding Pirates

Legal Issues about the Appearance Design of the 101 Building

Foreign Investment in Taiwan's Agricultural Technology Industry

Enforcement Rules of the Taiwan Trademark Law Amended

Taiwan Trademark Law Revised

Taiwan Copyright Law Revised

Taiwan Revised “Regulations on Promoting Industry”

Revised “Civil Procedure Code” Announced

Amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure promulgatedm

Taiwan Finally Enters the WTO

Taiwan Releases Amendments to Copyright Law

Taiwan Patent Law Revised

Taiwan Legislative Yuan Approves Draft Optical Media Management Law

New Company Law to Take Effect in Taiwan

Merger and Acquisition Law

Amendments to the Trademark Law

Taiwan released Draft Amendment of the Trademark Law

Draft Amendment to Taiwan Patent Law

Early Disclosure of Invention Patents Effective October 26, 2002

New Enforcement Rules to the Patent Law

Taiwan released Draft Amendments to the Copyright Law

Domain Names in Taiwan

On March 25, 1999, the Administative Yuan passed the Amendment to the Statute for Upgraded Industry. According to the amendment, foreign investors in Taiwan shall benefit from tax deductions at different rates. For example, if an investor in the new industries (e.g. biotechnology industry, etc.) holds shares of such a company for more than three years, it shall enjoy a tax deduction by 10%.

New Developments in Contract Law

China's National People's Congress passed a new Contract Law on March 15, 1999. It will take effect on October 1, 1999. The Economic Contract Law, Foreign Economic Contract Law and Technology Contract Law will be abolished at that time, and will be replaced by the new Contract Law.

One of the major differences from the current contract law is that the new Contract Law provides protection (particularly protection of know-how) and technology transfer have been added to the new contract law. Contracts related to intellectual property shall also be governed by related specific rules under intellectual property laws and regulations.

New Regulations on Pharmaceuticals

China's State Drug Administration issued five regulations on April 28, 1999 to upgrade pharmaceutical administration in China to international practices. The five regulations include Regulations on the Administration of Imported Pharmaceuticals, Regulations on the Approval of Imitated Pharmaceuticals, Regulations on the Approval of New Pharmaceuticals, Regulations on the Protection of New Pharmaceuticals and Technology Transfer, and Regulations on the Approval of New Bio-Products. Foreign pharmaceutical companies will need to comply with the new regulations in the course of sales, research & development, or investment in pharmaceutical areas.

R.O.C. Amends Its Software Export Monitoring System

September 23, 1996

On August 6, 1996, the Ministry of Economic Affairs announced its new revisions to the Computer Software Export Monitoring System (CSEMS). The Export Monitoring System was first implemented in 1993, as a result of demands made by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) during 301 negotiations with the Republic of China.

The task of implementing the System was delegated to the Institute for Information Industry (Triple I). The purpose of this program is to seize infringing export software before it leaves Taiwan. However, this plan has not been very successful in practice. From July of 1993 to March of 1996, 61,907 computer products were inspected. However, of that number, only 41 cases of suspected infringing products were discovered. None of the suspects were actually charged with a substantive copyright violation.

The ineffectiveness of this program appears to be due to the simplicity of evasion. The export inspection is triggered by registering for a Triple I export license. At least 30% of all licensed goods are inspected by Triple I. If any infringing goods are found, Triple I contacts the copyright owner and temporarily seizes the goods. Infringers bypass the system by simply failing to register. If software is not registered it is not inspected, and given the volume of goods which pass through Taiwan's international airport, unlikely to be noticed.

CSEMS adds a heavy burden to legitimate exporters of computer software. Although it costs nothing for an export permit, each shipment of software needs one. The permit must be applied for in person, and the application takes approximately 2 hours to complete. It then takes another 2 to 3 days to inspect the goods. Each year, when the US and Taiwan enter into a new round of Intellectual Property negotiations, the software industry puts pressure on the Bureau of Foreign Trade (BOFT) to abandon the system.

This year the US agreed to accept a slight revision to the system. Now, only computer, printer, and video game software are required to have permits. This will speed the export process a little bit. However, as long as the program exists, it will continue to be opposed by Taiwan's legitimate exporters and ignored by Taiwan's infringers.

Protection of Well-Known Marks in the PRC

September 18, 1996

As you may be aware, China promised that it would provide broad protection for famous marks in the 1995 Sino-US IP Agreement. The long awaited regulations on well-known mark verification were finally promulgated. The following are the main points of the Regulations on Determination and Administration of Well- Known Marks ("Regulations"):

The Regulations provide a set of criteria that direct the trademark authorities in determining well-known marks. The trademark authorities may verify a well-known mark based on serial factors:

  1. nationwide sales volume of the trademarked goods;
  2. the extent of use of the mark on the goods within a three-year period;
  3. the duration and extent of advertising and publicity for the mark;
  4. the global extent of registered and protection for the mark; and
  5. the extent of worldwide use of the mark.

Under the Regulations, The China Trademark Office is designated as the agency to verify famous marks. Once a registered mark is authenticated as well- known, the owner of the mark is entitled to block any applications for registration of other marks or request cancellation of any registered marks which would create confusion with the well-known mark. The prohibition on using famous marks extends broadly even to dissimilar goods. However, the Regulations set forth a statutory limitation, requiring the owner to file a petition for cancellation within two years from the date of constructive knowledge of such registration.

The Regulations still do not satisfy the 1995 Sino-US IP Agreement, which requires China to protect unregistered famous marks, nor have they met the requirements set forth in the Paris Convention with respect to the famous mark protection. Furthermore, the statutory limitation in the Regulations is not in compliance with that in the 1995 Sino-US IP Agreement. In accordance with the Agreement, an internationally recognized owner of a well-known mark enjoys at least five-year's time to act against a similar mark. As a signatory to the Paris Convention and the bilateral agreement, China is obliged to protect famous marks, including unregistered famous marks. Accordingly, the Trademark Law is still subject to revision.

New Domestic Sales Regulations in Guangdong Province

August 15, 1996

The Guangdong Province of the People's Republic of China recently announced new regulations regarding the percentage of domestic sales foreign-owned companies and Sino-foreign joint ventures can make.

Until now, foreign companies have been competing with their PRC based subsidiaries in world markets, as PRC subsidiaries have been prevented from conducting substantial sales in China. Before the implementation of the new regulations, foreign based companies were permitted to sell only 10 percent domestically; joint ventures between foreign companies and China were allowed to sell just 30 percent of their products in Guangdong. The new regulations allow for increases in the domestic sales ratio up to 100 percent, depending on the products involved.

Joint ventures that have invested in excess of US$15 million and that are comprised of at least a 50 percent foreign partnership, may now sell all of their products in the Guangdong market. Investments of US$5 million to US$15 million may sell between 50 and 60 percent of their production in the local market.

US-China Trade War over Chinese Pirating Business

June 21, 1996

The United States and China signed an agreement averting a trade war over Chinese pirating of software, music and movies, and US imports of silk and other Chinese-made luxury products. The US lifted sanctions after finding that China has taken significant concrete steps to enforce its 1995 Action Plan, particularly by closing CD factories and some 5000 mini- theaters, seizures of pirate CDs by Chinese customs, and renewed agreements to allow US music and film makers to enter cooperative projects and distribute in China.

By agreeing to lift sanctions, the US also avoided Chinese retaliation on US agricultural products, such as cotton and vegetable oils, auto and auto parts, telecommunications equipment, and audiovisual products. Although it did not put a dollar value on the list, officials in Beijing predicted that the value of Chinese sanctions would exceed U.S. sanctions. In addition, China threatened that it would halt shipments of U.S. aircraft to China as part of its counter measures.

The new agreement cannot be viewed as resolving the issue of Chinese piracy, but as one more step in a long march.

New MOU Grants Priority to US Trademark and Patent Holders

May 13, 1996

The United States (US) and the Republic of China (Taiwan) signed a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on April 10, 1996 in Washington, D.C. The MOU gives United States trademark and patent holders added protection under Taiwan law.

Taiwan's Trademark and Patent laws grants priority filing rights to nationals of countries which have a reciprocal agreement with Taiwan. Effective from April 10, 1996, if trademark or patent holders apply for patents or trademarks in Taiwan within a certain period of time, their rights will be protected effective from the date of their US registration. The priority right will block others who apply for the same patent or trademark after the US filing date.

Additionally, Taiwan's Patent Law, through the MOU, allows US nationals the opportunity to register patents for new microorganism species, which is prohibited for nationals of jurisdictions without such a bilateral agreement.

The provisions of the MOU offer US nationals a substantial amount of protection previously unavailable. However, to take advantage of this protection US trademark and patent holders must think globally from the time the right is first registered in the US. If the rights holder waits too long, they will loose this opportunity.

If you would like to take advantage of these new rights or have questions regarding any intellectual property matter in the Republic of China, please contact us.

R.O.C. Moves to Enlarge Trademark Protection

April 8, 1996

In an effort to promote Taiwan's effort to join the World Trade Organization (WTO), a group of government bodies led by the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) took the initiative to ease at least one of the restrictions imposed by the trademark law. In late January 1996 this group agreed to present a joint proposal to the Executive Yuan (EY) to expand the definition of "interested parties" under Taiwan's Trademark Law to include a foreign company's local agents, importers, and affiliates.

Under the current law, the term "interested party" refers to those persons who currently have a legal right which may be harmed by another's trademark registration. This is defined so that only a trademark owner, not its local agents, importers or affiliates, have a "legal right" under the current law. Expanding the definition of interested parties to include these groups will give them a method by which they can protect their contract-based interest in a trademark. This change will not become effective until it is approved by the Executive Yuan.

China Anti-Dumping Law

April 3, 1996

China is taking an aggressive step against developed countries to protect the interests of its own manufacturing industry. China will revise its draft anti-dumping law as early as late March of 1996. China has been targeted in more than 200 anti-dumping cases for its exportation of low- priced products to developed countries. China accuses those nations of implementing trade protectionism in the name of fair competition. A China trade official denounced the use of production figures from third countries to estimate production costs in China. He stated that figures ignore China's low cost labor, and thus inflate the true cost of production, creating the false impression that China is engaged in dumping.

In order to retaliate, the Chinese government recently announced that it would revise its anti-dumping law to protect the interests of Chinese manufacturers. The amended draft is expected to be submitted to the State Council for its review by the end of March, 1996.

China Trademark and Patent Application Statistics - 1995

March 28, 1996

Trademark applications and registrations in China have been escalating in the past few years. According to the Trademark Office, 538,725 trademarks were registered by the end of 1995, ranking China among the top ten countries for volume of trademark registrations. The Trademark Office further disclosed that 86,780 out of the 538,725 trademarks were foreign trademarks. In 1995, the Trademark Office received 166,098 applications for trademark registration, of which the domestic applications numbered 144,558 while foreign applications reached 21,540. Meanwhile, the Trademark Office approved 70,217 registrations in that year, among which 16,564 were foreign trademarks. It appears that the application to registration ratio is 49% for domestic marks, and 77% for foreign marks.

Foreign patent applications in China have significantly increased ever since China became the member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The China Patent Office recently reported that 83,045 applications were filed last year, of which 68,880 were home applications and 14,165 were foreign applications. The statistics from the China Patent Office revealed the number of specific applications as follows: (1) New Invention: 21,636, (2) Utility Model: 43,741, and (3) Design Patent: 17,668.

China Intellectual Property Enforcement

March 20, 1996

As you may be aware, the US is evaluating China's performance in enforcing intellectual property rights. As you must have read, this is a delicate time for US-Sino relations. China imposed martial law on March 1, 1996, and is conducting war games in the Taiwan Straits, and has imposed controls on foreign news agencies operating in China. China has responded to US complaints of unfair trade practices with its own report on the successes of its IPR efforts. In addition, the government has released enforcement statistics to demonstrate the scope and breadth of its efforts.

I. Enforcement Statistics

1. Court cases

The Supreme People's Court reported that approximately 1,600 intellectual property cases were handled in 1995, out of a total of 4,500,000 court cases. Over 6,500 cases involved a foreign party. Of the 1,600, 59% involved patent rights, 23% copyright, and 18% trademark rights. The low number of copyright and trademark cases is remarkable given the size of China's court system and total number of cases handled. Foreign companies are still extremely wary of entering a Chinese court.

2. Administrative Cases

The State Council's Working Conference on Intellectual Property Rights recently announced that Chinese administrative authorities seized 20 millions pirated CDS, 800,000 cassettes, 480,000 and 40,000 software programs in 1995. In addition, the administrative authorities handled 9,000 trademark infringement cases in the past year. Most foreign rights holders still prefer to deal with administrative authorities to protect their rights.

II. China's Response to US Complaints: The Report on Protecting Intellectual Property Rights

The Chinese government states in the report that China has kept its promise to authorize the State Council's Working Conference on Intellectual Property Rights ("WCIPR") to ensure fairness and uniformity in the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Since February of 1995, China has taken the following major steps:

  1. The WCIPR set up coordination offices in the 30 provinces to carry out the action plan;
  2. Both central and local joint inspection groups were established to undertake nationwide inspections;
  3. The joint inspection groups conducted investigations and inspections of the thirty-four CD plants by the end of July 1, 1995. As a result, the three CD plants were closed due to their failure to meet the registration requirements and IPR violations. However, the other thirty-one plants, were allowed to renew their licenses. They have been put under "tight supervision," with outside monitors visiting each plant;
  4. In August and November of 1995, the Press and Publication Administration issued circulars on using unique identifiers (SID Codes) on audio-video and electronic publication products;
  5. In January of 1996, the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Radio, Film and Television promulgated a circular prohibiting national performance of VCDs and Laser discs;
  6. The State Council promulgated the Regulations on Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights that became effective on October 1, 1995. From October 1 to December 31, 1995, Chinese Customs recorded 98 intellectual property works with the Customs database. In addition, Customs handled 1,084 cases nationwide, including infringement of copyright (1028 cases), trademark (46 cases) and patent (10 cases) between September 1994 and December 1995;
  7. In August, 1995, the Press and Publication Administration required all CD plants to use SID source identification codes on CDS. The requirement for title verification has also been imposed by the State Copyright Administration ("SCA"). All publication contracts with foreign publishers are required to record with the SCA before April 1, 1996; and
  8. The State Council set up about 80 patent administrative offices in provinces, major cities and special economic zones to mediate patent disputes.

©&® 2010 Wang & Wang